|
February 03, 2004
Comments
I am suspicious of any new vehicle until it actully has a successful flight. The track record of proposed vehicles ever actually flying is pretty bad. Posted by: Rocket Man Blog at February 4, 2004 08:58 PM Yes. I had hopes that SpaceX might break this trend (still might), but they've appeared to slip several months. It's by no means a death knell, but it has me curious as to what's going on. Kistler has me skeptical because I can see how much work they have left to do before they can launch anything. They have a lot of hardware, true, but every passing month eats into the 'shelf life' of the hardware, further dissipates what knowledge of/familiarity with the design remains, and makes it that much harder all around to restart development and manufacturing. Posted by: T.L. James at February 5, 2004 06:48 AM Amazing. Were the pieces-parts still hanging about Bldg. 303? Did they ever put caps in the LAP RP Domes, built the toroidal LOX Tank, or solidify the downcomer design? Posted by: Daniel Morris at February 6, 2004 02:46 PM The parts in the hangar (303?) were moved who-knows-where (420?) last summer/fall to make room for Orbiter tooling storage. The K-1 tooling is mostly still in place, but is being progressively squeezed in upon by the new NCAM monument tools. The office trailers are still out on the apron by Final Assembly, though...brand new and never occupied. I know next to nothing about the design, as I was in Palmdale working on VentureStar the entire time K-1 was going on (and no, the dark humor of that does not escape me). Posted by: T.L. James at February 6, 2004 07:32 PM What can I say that won’t sound sardonic? I feel your pain Think X Prize. Posted by: Daniel Morris at February 7, 2004 12:09 PM |
