May 21, 2006
Ray Guns on the Way?
Oh now, this looks like fun: Inside Two 'Star Wars' Projects. Looks like ABL might be obsolete (in that it uses a chemical laser) before it ever flies. What's really interesting in this article, though, is not so much the technology as it is the approach that's being used to develop it. By pursuing reasonable milestones at a measured pace instead of trying to jump to an all-up weapons system from a blank sheet of paper, the Pentagon is having much more success than they did the first time around, and for significantly less money. Granted, the new technology builds on what was developed in the original incarnation of "Star Wars", and technology in general has progressed dramatically in the past fifteen years, but the development strategy is no less sensible for that -- look at what happened with Shuttle, for instance, where a huge all-at-once leap was taken with immature technologies. And as for applications, it looks like the FEL is already finding potential uses in the chip industry: The free-electron laser is a special kind of laser with the advantage that its beam can be tuned through a wide range of frequencies in much the same way that you can dial up different frequencies on a radio....and possibly the always-on-the-horizon fusion power industry: They also tested the system on silicon surfaces covered with a mixture of hydrogen and deuterium. Deuterium is an isotope of hydrogen: Instead of the single proton that hydrogen has as a nucleus, deuterium has a proton and a neutron. It has the same chemical characteristics as hydrogen but it weighs about twice as much. This weight difference means that the silicon-deuterium bond vibrates more slowly than the silicon-hydrogen bond, so the resonant wavelength is very different than for hydrogen-silicon. ![]() Comments
Bruce's head explodes in 5... 4... 3... 2... 1... :) Also, If you read this post: http://space4peace.blogspot.com/2006/05/creating-new-cold-war.html Where he says among other, interesting, things: "But in fact Iran does not have long-range nuclear missiles. And why would Iran fire missiles towards Europe? Iran acknowledges that its primary enemy today is Israel which could be hit with medium range missiles." (Never mind all that "Death to America", "Down with the decadent west" stuff that seems to be coming out of the mouth of the president of Iran lately...) And if you read this article: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1148287850178&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull Where the article's title is: "Iran test-fires long-range missile" I don't know about anyone else, but I'm wondering what people will say in 50-60 years regarding Iran, and why we didn't take out that madman when we had the chance, similar to Hitler in the 30's... Posted by: RobW at May 24, 2006 05:25 AM |