|
August 15, 2006
Resurrection and Luddism
Yes, I'm supposed to be on hiatus, but I'm stuck at home waiting for window installers. Might as well blog. This Daily Mail article isn't really news, since the idea of resurrecting a mammoth from frozen sperm has been making the rounds for several years. What's interesting about the article is the attitude expressed in the comments section (cherry picked here for brevity): It is a very intriguing and exciting idea. I personally do not have any problem with the thought of procreation through this method of retrieving shelved sperm. If dinosaurs, mammoths and dodos could be walking again on the face of the earth, I think it would be a landmark in achievement of science.Yet again, someone confusing biological cloning (making what amounts to an after-the-fact identical twin) with sci-fi "cloning" (making an identical copy of an individual). Since no one has any way of copying memories, character, aquired brain structure, and other experience-influenced attributes from one individual to another, this should hardly be a concern. And never mind that even if it were possible, we do not have the source material for any of those individuals...their dead brains being somewhat less than fresh. I liked Jurassic Park, but this might not be such a good idea in practice.The attitude is a mix between luddism (opposition to new technology), misanthropy (humans are bad and not to be trusted with such power), and fatalism (the world is doomed anyhow, what does it matter?). Not a good omen for the future. Posted by T.L. James on August 15, 2006 08:14 AM
| TrackBack
Comments
Henry VIII in the company of Hitler and Stalin? What's wrong with this picture? Posted by: Berin Szoka at August 23, 2006 04:43 PM |
