|
May 13, 2007
When Space Mildew Attacks
Being an astronaut is probably not the best choice of occupation if you're a germophobe: Imagine their surprise when they opened a rarely-accessed service panel in Mir's Kvant-2 Module and discovered a large free-floating mass of water. "According to the astronauts' eyewitness reports, the globule was nearly the size of a basketball," Ott said.Setting aside the juvenile "ick" factor, what's interesting about this is that NASA is working on a handheld device to locate and identify the bacteria and fungi that attack spacecraft surfaces (which Star Trek fans will surely gush over as a proto-tricorder). While I'm not a big fan of the "spinoff" justification for NASA's existence (it's a cliche, and the claims that a given technology is a "NASA spinoff" are often inaccurate), this is certainly an example of innovation being driven by new needs encountered in space exploration. As one of the interviewees suggests, a descendent of the LOCAD-PTS device being tested today might prove useful in the detection of life on Mars...even if it's not sophisticated enough to recognize nonterrestrial life as such, locating and identifying common terrestrial microorganisms will at least whittle down the number of false positives. But the true "spinoffs" (groan) will be in terrestrial medicine. One example is the spread of "nosocomial" infections in hospitals -- if it becomes easier to locate pathogens, and to identify which pathogen it is, it may be possible to further reduce the rates of secondary infection, while also reducing the development of resistance by tailoring sanitation procedures and verifying their effectiveness. Simply being able to "see" where pathogens are will make a huge difference in dealing with them. Posted by T.L. James on May 13, 2007 10:55 AM
| TrackBack
Comments
The article you reference gives examples of how these microorganisms can adversely impact various spacecraft components, but I wonder if it is possible or even desirable to completely sanitize spacecraft. To some extent, don't we need the little buggers around? I'm not just referring to those with which we enjoy a symbiotic relationship -- do we really understand the long-term impact of not having our immune systems occasionally challenged? Posted by: Aaron_J at May 13, 2007 09:09 PM I don't think anyone's goal is to completely sanitize a spacecraft. But cleanliness is a good thing - all that mold would have my nose kicking up a fuss. Hmm - an aquarium is a closed system (more or less) like Mir or ISS. If one has algae growing in a tank you can buy a fish that eats the stuff, yes? I wonder if the future won't see wee little beasties that love to eat mold and other crud aboard stations and ships. Of course you'll need to have predators around to eat the crud eaters so their numbers don't get out of control ... Posted by: Brian at May 14, 2007 12:47 AM Hey, now that is a brilliant idea -- schools of air-breathing goldfish flitting about inside space stations, stopping here and there to feed off patches of microorganisms growing on the walls, darting in and out of recesses and enclosures to get at the bubbles of goop hiding there, scurrying away like a drawn curtain when an astronaut floats by. That'd make a great visual for a science fiction film. Posted by: T.L. James at May 15, 2007 07:12 AM As long as the space station is manned, won't you have predators on board to keep the crud-eater population under control? And since most everything is tastless in zero-gee, with a little hot sauce they'll taste as good as anything else NASA can cook up. Posted by: Aaron_J at May 15, 2007 09:04 PM |
